Successful Representation of EK KV SPV3 OÜ in a Procurement Dispute Concerning Line Corridor Maintenance Works
Case
RASK’s attorney-at-law Keidi Kõiv successfully represented EK KV SPV3 OÜ in disputes concerning procurement procedures for line corridor maintenance works organized by Elektrilevi OÜ. The dispute involved two procurements in which the client had submitted the best tenders, but Elektrilevi OÜ attempted to annul the procurement procedures.
Attorney-at-law Keidi Kõiv effectively demonstrated to the Public Procurement Review Committee that the error alleged by the contracting authority—used as justification for annulling the procurements—did not correspond to the actual circumstances and appeared to be aimed at excluding the client from the procurement procedures.
The Review Committee agreed with RASK’s arguments and concluded that the annulment of the procurement procedures was unjustified.
Attorney-at-law Keidi Kõiv effectively demonstrated to the Public Procurement Review Committee that the error alleged by the contracting authority—used as justification for annulling the procurements—did not correspond to the actual circumstances and appeared to be aimed at excluding the client from the procurement procedures.
The Review Committee agreed with RASK’s arguments and concluded that the annulment of the procurement procedures was unjustified.